Nigeria’s President, Muhammadu Buhari has affirmed the end of the arrangement of the troubled Managing Director of the Nigerian Ports Authority, Hadiza Bala-Usman.
Buhari uncovered this on July 12 in a testimony recorded at the Federal High Court, Lagos, in a suit brought against him by the Chief Executive Officer of Maritime Media Limited, Asu Beks, and two others.
In the suit stamped FHC/L/CS/485/2021, the offended parties had recorded a suit moving the forces of Buhari to comprise the NPA Board and designate the Executive Directors without response to the NPA Act, PUNCH reports.
They additionally asserted that Buhari rashly reappointed Hadiza Bala-Usman a half year to the lapse of her residency.
The oath, which was documented as Buhari’s primer issue with the suit was endorsed by Agan Tabitha of the Civil Litigation Department of the Federal Ministry of Justice, Abuja, in the interest of Buhari’s direction.
Buhari contended that “the supposed reappointment of the third litigant (Hadiza Bala-Usman) whereupon this court is being called upon to arbitrate, has since been ended by the primary respondent (Buhari) and the moment suit surpassed by the occasion of that end.”
He additionally contended that the offended parties do not have the locus standi to bring the case and the Federal High Court has no locale to hear the matter.
Thus, Buhari asked the court to excuse the suit as it has gotten absolutely scholastic.
“We present that it is obvious from the Plaintiffs’ testimony, the inquiries for assurance just as the reliefs looked for. Clearly the Plaintiffs neither experienced any injury because of the demonstration or exclusion of the first Defendant.
“It is additionally apparent that the case against the Defendants is that the court ought to pronounce the supposed activity of the first Defendant re-delegating, selecting and setting up of leading group of NPA unlawful as it repudiates areas 2 and 10 NPA Act Cap N126, LFN 2004, even without expressing that they have experienced any close to home harm past some other individual because of the said arrangement.
“It is our accommodation that the Plaintiffs here don’t have the imperative locus standi to initiate this activity. Locus standi means the right of involved with foundation an activity in a courtroom,” he contended.
The offended parties in the suit are Asu Beks, Tompra Abarowei, and Miebi Senge as first to third offended parties individually.
The first to fourth litigants are Buhari, Minister of Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi; Hadiza Bala-Usman, and the Chairman NPA Board, Emmanuel Adesoye, separately.
The matter is before Justice Tujjani Ringim of the Federal High Court, Ikoyi, Lagos.
SaharaReporters had detailed how Bala-Usman misled her bosses and undermined the arrangement by the Nigerian government to decongest Lagos ports by digging the Calabar Port, among other such expert wrongdoings.
SaharaReporters discovered that Usman deceived Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo, Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN), and the Senate about the suggestions of a board she had set up to research the digging project at the Calabar Port.
Her untruths have cost Nigeria lives, billions of naira and occupations as Nigeria keeps on depending on Lagos ports with its orderly clog and different issues, it was likewise accumulated.
For example, far and wide blockage at the Lagos ports costs Nigeria $55 million (about N20.8 billion) day by day, as per a 2020 report by Dynanmar, a Dutch consultancy firm.
As indicated by sources in the business, Usman reliably deceived Osinbajo, Chairman of the Presidential Task Team on the Apapa gridlock, entrusted with the work of decongesting the Lagos ports, that digging the Calabar Port was not feasible.
The task is under Calabar Channel Management, a joint endeavor activity between a consortium drove by Niger Global Engineering and Technical Company Limited and the Nigerian Ports Authority.
Following charges that cash was paid for digging at Calabar Port with nothing to show for it, Usman set up a board to explore three claims: One, that Niger Global Engineering and Technical Company Limited didn’t follow fair treatment in completing the work; two, that digging Calabar Ports isn’t reasonable and should not be done; and three, that work was not done on the site by the organization.
The report of the council alongside different archives located by SaharaReporters without a doubt demonstrate that work had started at Calabar Port and that it was suitable, yet Usman disregarded the report of the board and demanded that the work should be halted.
Comments are closed.