Aloy Ejimakor, the Special Counsel of Nnamdi Kanu, head of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, has encouraged the Nigerian Government to respect the call by the United Nations, Human Rights Council Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, to deliver the Biafra instigator.
Ejimakor cautioned that the Nigerian Government might set off a terrible political struggle on the off chance that it neglects to deliver Kanu.
He noticed that such a strategic clash might transform Nigeria into an outsider State.
The UN bunch prosecuted both the Nigerian and the Kenyan state run administrations for the capture and exceptional interpretation, torment and proceeded with confinement of Kanu without fair treatment
The UN Working gathering requested that the Nigerian Government ought to promptly deliver the secessionist genuinely and pay him satisfactory remunerations for abusing his basic freedoms.
Responding, Ejimakor focused on that the choice of the UN Working gathering is restricting on Nigeria.
An assertion he marked peruses: “The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention is a semi legal body that has a staying alive legitimate order of the United Nations to consider and settle basic freedoms petitions against part countries of the UN.
“Its decisions or choices (carefully called Opinions, for example, was as of late given for Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, are lawfully restricting on Nigeria on heap grounds, including the way that the choice depends on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the two of which Nigeria endorsed quite a few years prior.
“Endorsement is a method by which a country makes itself subject to global regulations and deals. What’s more, by the arrangements of Section 12 of the Nigerian Constitution and a plenty of choices by the Supreme Court of Nigeria, confirmation makes Nigeria subject to anything that it sanctioned.
“It should be clarified that the UN Working Group is a necessary arm of the United Nations Human Rights Council which has the more extensive UN order to decide basic liberties issues radiating from part countries of the UN.
“It’s a given hence that, as an individual from the United Nations, Nigeria is dependent upon choices giving from these UN bodies.
“It will be reviewed that the UN body as of late considered Nnamdi Kanu’s matter and held that “The evacuation of Mr. Kanu from Kenya added up to exceptional version”.
“In explanation, the body additionally held that: ‘Mr. Kanu’s capture and move to Nigeria coming up short on legitimate premise and fair treatment of regulation, disregarding article 9 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and article 9 of the Covenant’.
“In its decisions, that’s what the UN body held “The proper cure would be for the Government of Nigeria to deliver Mr. Kanu right away and accord him an enforceable right to pay as per worldwide regulation.
“Without more, Nigeria is compelled by a solemn obligation to execute this choice in its letters and soul. What’s more, it is normal to do so immediately and to, in no less than a half year, record a conventional report of its execution with the United Nations.
“Unarguably, neglecting to carry out this choice would imply that Nigeria is pounding its nose at the United Nations and accidentally setting off a frightful strategic clash that could make it an untouchable State.”